Product surfaces
Web, iOS, and Android work shaped around the journeys and acceptance criteria in your backlog.
Keep your platform moving.
Extend the team behind your live multi-tenant SaaS with an India-based pod covering product engineering, quality, and release operations.
Web and mobile. Backend and DevOps. QA and technical writing.
Scope the work, then the pod.
Cover the delivery disciplines your existing product needs.
WebiOSAndroidAPIsCloudQA
Pod scoping models
6 / 12 / 20 FTE
Proposed full-time-equivalent scoping models, not currently staffed teams or a promise of availability. Roles, capacity, and start dates require an agreed scope.
Platform foundations
Backend and API work for your live multi-tenant SaaS, with tenant boundaries included in the agreed test scope.
Delivery operations
DevOps and QA work that connects reviewed changes, testing, and release preparation.
Technical writing
Documentation for the delivered work, so your team can review changes and operate what ships.
Changes your team can review.
Build around an agreed backlog, clear acceptance criteria, and controlled release access.
Scope
Agree backlog priorities, acceptance criteria, ownership, and the access needed for the work.
Review
Develop through pull requests. Access to release branches is PR-only, with review and merge permissions agreed with your team.
Release
Prepare QA evidence, release notes, and operational handoffs for the changes your team approves.
Proposed biweekly release cadence
A proposed contract target, subject to signed scope. Release timing depends on the agreed backlog, review, test evidence, and client approvals. It is not a promise that every change ships on a fixed date.
Define incident support up front.
Agree priority definitions, coverage, and escalation ownership before the pod starts.
All timings below are proposed contract targets subject to signed scope, not results or guarantees. The agreement must define working hours, coverage windows, and when each clock starts.
| Priority type | Proposed target |
|---|---|
| P0 incident | Response within 1 hourFix or workaround within 8 working hours |
| P1 issue | Agreed in scope |
| P2 issue | Agreed in scope |
| P3 issue | Agreed in scope |
Priority classifications and lower-priority response times require agreement. These targets do not imply around-the-clock support or replace your existing incident owner.
See the work and the blockers.
A sprint report can put scope, review evidence, and decisions in one place.
Illustrative sample sprint report
This is a reporting format for discussion, not client results, a live project board, or a claim of completed work.
Planned scope
- Example web and mobile backlog changes
- Example API acceptance criteria
- Proposed documentation updates
Review evidence
- PR links and reviewer decisions
- QA findings and tenant-boundary tests
- Release notes and approval status
Open decisions
- Client review or access dependencies
- Unresolved defects and delivery risks
- Next scope decisions and owners
Agree the reporting format, source systems, and owners with your team. Actual delivery evidence belongs in your approved project and code systems.
Before the platform pod starts.
Are the pod models staffed teams we can book now?
No. The proposed 6, 12, and 20 FTE models are scoping options, not claims about current staffing or availability. Role mix, start date, and capacity require agreement in the signed scope.
Will the pod use our existing stack?
Review your existing architecture and tooling during scoping. Technology choices, access, and integration limits need agreement before delivery; no specific language or framework is promised here.
Who controls releases?
Release-branch access is PR-only. Your team and the pod agree review, merge, test, and release approval responsibilities. The proposed biweekly cadence is a contract target subject to signed scope, not an unconditional shipping guarantee.
Does the incident target mean continuous coverage?
No. The proposed P0 targets require agreed coverage windows, working hours, escalation paths, and clock definitions in the signed scope. P1, P2, and P3 timings are agreed in scope rather than assumed.
Scope your platform pod.
Bring your backlog, architecture, and release responsibilities to the conversation.